the two sides of an issue are those affected by it and those not affected by it

An idea proposed by A.R. Moxon in his newsletter

Does this allow for people to be shut down because "it doesn't affect you"? I definitely like it for trans rights and so on (the newsletter is about Dave Chapelle), but could it be used for e.g. "my kids' vaccinations don't affect you"? (herd immunity might disprove that, but I'm sure there are other examples)

Oh: I think this is only a response to people who insist that you need to hear both sides. It's not arguing for that itself.